European Refugee Crisis: The Anatomy of a Cover-up

StormCloudsGathering  |  The Pontiac Tribune

The real story behind the refugee crisis in Europe is far stranger than fiction.

Migrant Crisis EuropeThe Anatomy of a Cover-up

If you watch the news, you’ve probably heard about the refugee crisis in Europe (or the “migrant crisis” as some are referring to it).

Nearly a million asylum seekers from the Middle East and Africa are flooding across the borders.

According to the BBC, as of July, European countries had received over 437,000 Asylum applications for the year. In 2014 more than 840,000 applications were received.

So why is this happening? Where are migrants/refugees coming from? Why are there so many of them?

More: Syrian Refugee Crisis: Media Tries to Use a Dead Boy to Start a New War

The corporate media and the political establishment on both the left and the right will answer those questions with a combination of half truths and outright lies. This shouldn’t be surprising.

It is in their interest to cover-up the role they played in creating the crisis.

Let’s take a look at the top 7 countries origin for these refugees, Syria, Afghanistan, Kosovo, Eritrea, Serbia, Pakistan, Iraq:

Syrian Refugee MapA lot of attention is being put on Syria, because that’s where the largest numbers are coming from.

Millions are fleeing a conflict that has raged since 2011, and many are using this to push for an escalation of military force by the West. Because obviously if we bomb the heck out of the place, everything will go to normal.

Of course it sounds perfectly rational to take down ISIS, these guys are nasty, but upon closer inspection we find that the West is much more focused on removing President Assad from power.

That might strike you as absurd, considering that the Syrian government is one of the last forces preventing ISIS from completely taking over the region. But it makes much more sense once you see how ISIS rose to power in the first place.

Who funded them? Who armed ISIS? Oh, they don’t like to talk about that do they?

Since at least 2011 the U.S. and its allies have been backing rebel groups in Syria, the goal of course being regime change. This escalated right after they had finished toppling Libya. There’s a reason for that.

The weapons from Gaddafi’s armories were shipped through Turkey into Syria and distributed to combatants.

Even then it was clear that the majority of these weapons were ending up in the hands of jihadists.

The official narrative was that these rebels were freedom fighters, and that this was an organic uprising, an extension of the Arab Spring. The media and the political establishment in the both United States and Europe stuck to this story until it became impossible to hide the atrocities being committed by these so called freedom fighters.

A Department of Defense document from 2012 showed that the U.S. government was fully aware of the fact that these fighters were connected to AQI or Al-Qaeda in Iraq (ISIS before they re-branded).

The document showed that the U.S. knew that the fighters they were supporting intended to form a caliphate.

Not only did they know what was happening, they viewed it as a good thing.

In fact in 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations released an article openly stating that “In short, the FSA needs al-Qaeda now.”

“The Syrian rebels would be immeasurably weaker today without al-Qaeda in their ranks. By and large, Free Syrian Army (FSA) battalions are tired, divided, chaotic, and ineffective. Feeling abandoned by the West, rebel forces are increasingly demoralized as they square off with the Assad regime’s superior weaponry and professional army. Al-Qaeda fighters, however, may help improve morale,” wrote Ed Husain on CFR’s website, Adjunct Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies

The influx of jihadis brings discipline, religious fervor, battle experience from Iraq, funding from Sunni sympathizers in the Gulf, and most importantly, deadly results. In short, the FSA needs al-Qaeda now.”

Publicly Washington continued to claim that the West was only assisting the “moderate rebels”, the FSA in particular. However the FSA was very open about the fact that they regularly conducted joint operations with Al-Nusra, and Al-Nusra had direct alliances with ISIS.

No matter how you cut it the U.S. and its allies brought ISIS to power, and in doing so they they created a flood of refugees.

And let’s not forget how this all started.

Who toppled Iraq and Afghanistan creating a power vacuum, unleashing decades of chaos and destruction, and creating breeding grounds for extremists?

It’s no accident that these are among the top countries of origin for refugees.

Refugee Crisis

While it might be convenient for Europeans to pin the blame entirely on the U.S., the reality of the matter is that European leaders have not only enabled Washington by refusing to call them out, but they also have played an active and direct role in the aggression.

The blood is on their hands too, so it’s not in their interest to tell you the truth.

These factual omissions play right into the hands of a right wing backlash which frames this debate as simply an immigration issue, and plays off of the public’s distrust of Muslims. Those who actually created the mess are perfectly happy to let the victims become scapegoats.

This is a classic case of Problem, Reaction, Solution.

You’re being tricked. You’re being herded towards more war, more chaos, more suffering.

Which ironically will just create more refugees.


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published.